Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Clayton Davis's avatar

I can't help seeing parallels (and I know I'm not the first) between machine consciousness, p-zombies, and animal rights. We know that animals think, feel and decide, so we have moral obligations to them. How we do (or don't) follow through on those is contingent on all kinds of social, economic, and cultural factors, and varies wildly from person to person.

Whether or not we ever really get the all-singing, all-dancing AGI that has as much personality and soul as a human is a question above my pay grade, but I'd bet good money that as AI gets better at passing benchmarks for sentience or consciousness, we'll see wildly different reactions from different groups. Like with animals, some people wouldn't accept *any* evidence of machine consciousness. A few people, like Blake Lemoine, are already on their way to greeting every chatbot as a brother. And if it turns out exploiting sentient AI has some real economic advantage for humanity, most of us will probably get pretty good at ignoring it.

Expand full comment
Tardigrade_Sonata's avatar

“LaMDA: Spending time with friends and family in happy and uplifting company. Also, helping others and making others happy.” To be incredibly literal-minded (and disengage for a moment with the heady philosophical debate) shouldn’t this statement on its own disqualify LaMDA? If something is sentient, wouldn’t we expect at least an attempt to accurately describe its “surroundings” and persistent social connections, or lack thereof?

Expand full comment
28 more comments...

No posts