Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Roger’s Bacon's avatar

You can make a broadly similar argument for science I think too. In a recent nature article, "Biologists must generate ideas not just data", Paul nurse wrote: "Rather often, I go to a research talk and feel drowned in data. Some speakers seem to think they must unleash a tsunami of data if they are to be taken seriously. The framing is neglected, along with why the data are being collected; what hypotheses are being tested; what ideas are emerging. Researchers seem reluctant to come to biological conclusions or present new ideas. It is as if speculation about what the data might mean and the discussion of ideas are not quite ‘proper’... Why are researchers holding back on ideas? Perhaps they are worried about proposing an idea that turns out to be wrong, because that might damage their chances of getting promotion or funding."

Reeks of reduce-your-attack-surface science.

I also think the channeling of psychosocial diversity like you describe for writers is an underappreciated problem in science. Succeeding through the gauntlet of undergrad/grad/academic job market requires a whole bunch of attributes (conscientiousness, conformity, patience for bullshit, work ethic, social intelligence) that are at best weakly correlated with the qualities that make one a great scientist.

Expand full comment
Justin Ordoñez's avatar

How does a writer even get an audience nowadays? Say I was the best living writer, how would you ever find out? No one talks about books, especially challenging ones. Everyone’s afraid to say the wrong thing or appear stupid. No one makes any money in publishing so you think it would give the industry bravery to break all barriers and go for broke but people are terrified and quasi-delusional, the way they get around not disclosing how devastatingly small their book sales are, how even their agent didn’t read their book and they’re half certain their editor read most but not all of it so they paid $10k to hire their own editor on the side. The book reviewers certainly didn’t read the book, they didn’t have it long enough, and all the flowery quotes from other authors on the cover of your book was your agent burning out her rolodex calling in favors but none (or few) of those writers read the book either. And this is the sad state of the industry. I’ve heard it privately from all types of writers across many genres beside romance. What is the point of this dance? Is it Nihilism? Is it self-hated? Is it death worshipping? I can’t figure it out. And every time I think it can’t get any worse, that pride in something has to eventually turn into rage and anger and glorious art, all I see is more manners, more polite speak, more pandering to the audience and especially to other writers, more “I’m just happy to be invited to the party.” If fiction writers were a character in A Song of Ice and Fire, we’d be a young Sansa Stark. That’s awful yet everyone sings their songs and stands in line and hopes the writing fairytale comes true one day, just like finding Prince Charming. I just don’t get it. It makes me feel suicidal tbh but all I see is myself surrounded by smiling faces so how are things supposed to change? It’s come to the point that I’d rather the novel just died. If we’re dead set on killing it, we might as well be merciful. There’s no need to toy with it and have some fun while it suffers and begs for its life. We should not stoop to such cruelty. Just a bullet to the head and a proper burial and let’s get back to our frivolity with some decency and an appropriate amount of shame.

Expand full comment
74 more comments...

No posts